The distinction
Vetting assesses suitability and risk. Misconduct assesses behaviour and accountability. They are separate processes with different purposes, governed by distinct regulations. One process does not replace the other; they operate in parallel.
Key Differences at a Glance
Police Vetting
- • Forward-looking suitability
- • Preventive risk assessment
- • Based on Vetting Code of Practice
- • Outcome: Clearance held or removed
Misconduct
- • Retrospective accountability
- • Evidential behavior assessment
- • Based on Police (Conduct) Regs
- • Outcome: Disciplinary sanctions
Procedural Safeguards
Because misconduct is disciplinary, it involves higher evidential thresholds and formal representation. Vetting, being a risk assessment, focuses on whether an officer meets the mandatory condition of service (holding clearance).
The recent 2026 court ruling further clarified how these two frameworks interact, particularly regarding unproven allegations.
Read more on the 2026 court ruling →Vetting Impact Checker
If you are a serving officer involved in a professional standards review, use our impact checker to see which framework may be primary in your situation.
Access the Impact Checker →