Police Pay

Police Misconduct &
Career Risk

Complete Regulation-Based Guide to Hearings, Suspension, Dismissal & Barred List Outcomes (England & Wales, 2026 Update)

Independent Explanatory Guidance

Trust Notice: Not legal advice. Based on Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020 & Police Regulations 2003.

What Is Police Misconduct?

Police misconduct refers to breaches of the Standards of Professional Behaviour under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020. Allegations are assessed by the Appropriate Authority, investigated by Professional Standards Departments, and may result in a non-disciplinary Reflective Practice Review (RPRP), Written Warnings, Final Written Warnings, Reduction in Rank, or Dismissal for Gross Misconduct. Dismissed officers must be reported to the College of Policing and placed on the police barred list.

Start Here If...

The Police Misconduct Process

A structured walkthrough of the statutory framework governing police discipline in England & Wales.

Stage 1 Allegation & Recording

The process begins when an allegation is formally recorded. This typically originates from one of three sources:

  • Complaint: A formal expression of dissatisfaction by a member of the public regarding an officer's conduct.
  • Conduct Matter: An internal report, often raised by a colleague or supervisor, indicating a potential breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour.
  • Death or Serious Injury (DSI): An automatic referral to the Independent Office for Police Conduct (IOPC) following incidents involving police contact.

Stage 2 Severity Assessment

Once recorded, the Appropriate Authority (the chief officer, who can delegate to an inspector or above or equivalent staff, in practice usually the Professional Standards Department) must conduct a severity assessment under Regulation 14. They determine whether the conduct, if proven, would amount to misconduct, gross misconduct or neither:

Misconduct

A breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour that is serious enough to justify disciplinary action (usually a written or final written warning).

Gross Misconduct

A breach so serious that dismissal would be justified. See our Gross Misconduct Guide for detailed analysis.

Stage 3 Investigation Pathways

Depending on the severity and complexity, the matter is routed into one of several investigation pathways:

  • Reflective Practice Review Process (RPRP): Used for lower-level mistakes where the focus is on learning and development, not punishment. Formal disciplinary action is not taken.
  • Local Investigation: Handled entirely by the force's own PSD.
  • Directed Investigation: The IOPC directs the local PSD on how to conduct the investigation.
  • Independent Investigation: Undertaken entirely by IOPC investigators for the most severe or complex cases.

Stage 4 Notices & Rights

If formal investigation is required, the officer will be served written notice:

  • Regulation 17 Notice: Informing the officer that they are under investigation, the conduct alleged, the severity assessment and their rights, with the terms of reference (the investigator is appointed under regulation 15).
  • Regulation 20 Interview Notice: Written notice of the date, time and place of the interview, which the officer must attend.
Legal Representation Rights

Throughout this stage, officers have the right to seek advice from their Police Federation representative or legal counsel. For probationers navigating this, refer to our Regulation 13 capability guide.

Stage 5 Hearing Structure

If there is a case to answer and proceedings are brought, the case goes to a misconduct meeting or a misconduct hearing (or an accelerated hearing where the special conditions are met). Which one depends on the case to answer and your record:

  • Misconduct Meetings: Held in private for misconduct cases, conducted by one person at least one rank above the officer (or a more senior staff member unless operational policing is substantially involved). Maximum sanction is a Final Written Warning.
  • Misconduct Hearings: Held in public for cases of Gross Misconduct, or where an officer had a Final Written Warning in force or was reduced in rank within the previous 2 years (regulation 23(10)). From 2016 to May 2024 they were chaired by a Legally Qualified Chair (LQC). Since 7 May 2024 the chief officer (or a delegate) chairs, with two lay members, and a legally qualified person advises (regulation 28(4)).

The standard of proof applied at these hearings is the civil standard: the balance of probabilities (i.e., it is more likely than not that the conduct occurred). It is not the criminal standard of "beyond reasonable doubt".

Stage 6 Sanctions Matrix

If the panel finds misconduct or gross misconduct, it must impose disciplinary action (regulation 42(1)):

Reflective Practice: Not a sanction. Used where neither misconduct nor gross misconduct is found (regulation 42(1A)).
Written Warning: Valid for 18 months (regulation 42(9)); transfers with you to another force.
Final Written Warning: Valid for 2 years, extendable to 5 at a hearing (regulation 42(9) and (10)).
Reduction in Rank: Hearings only. For misconduct, only with a live final written warning or several unconnected incidents; for gross misconduct, only in exceptional circumstances (regulation 42). Not possible for constables.
Dismissal Without Notice: The ultimate sanction, terminating employment and initiating placement on the Police Barred List.

How Misconduct Affects Career Progression

Formal misconduct findings, and even live investigations, carry immediate and often lasting consequences for an officer's career trajectory within the police service.

Promotion Restrictions

The Conduct Regulations set no national promotion bar for a live warning; it is force policy, and some forces make officers ineligible until the warning expires. After a reduction in rank, Home Office guidance (paragraph 11.143) sets a 2 year rebuttable presumption against re-appointment to the lost rank.

Transfer Implications

The regulations do not stop a transfer during an investigation; the receiving force's policy decides. A live warning transfers with you and remains live (Home Office guidance, paragraph 11.130).

Vetting Overlap

Misconduct and vetting are separate but overlapping. From 13 July 2026, if you were subject to a misconduct meeting or hearing and were not dismissed, the vetting authority must reassess your clearance (Police (Vetting) Regulations 2025, regulation 5A(3)). Withdrawal of clearance is a separate route to dismissal.

Specialist Role Withdrawal

Officers in specialist units (e.g., Firearms, Counter Terrorism) may have their authorisation or enhanced vetting withdrawn during misconduct proceedings. There is no national rule in the Conduct Regulations; it is decided under force policy and the relevant authorisation and vetting processes.

Temporary Promotion Impact

Home Office guidance says a temporary promotion should not be rescinded solely because an officer is under investigation or in reflective practice, and that a suspended officer keeps a temporary promotion allowance (paragraphs 5.30 and 5.31).

UK Police Misconduct Statistics

(England & Wales – Latest Home Office Figures)

Data Source Notice: Data compiled from official Home Office "Police misconduct, England and Wales" annual statistical releases (financial year ending 31 March).

A) National Overview (Latest Official Figures)

Police officer cases finalised under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020, from the Home Office release Police misconduct, England and Wales: year ending 31 March 2025 (published 22 January 2026, Official Statistics in Development, so figures may be revised). "Officers involved" counts distinct officers; "Dismissals" includes "would have been dismissed" findings. The Home Office says the comparable series starts with the year ending 31 March 2023, so we do not show earlier years.

Year Ending 31 Mar
2024/25
Allegations Finalised
15,843
Officers Involved
8,031 (5.2%)
Referred to Proceedings
1,687
Dismissals
695
% Workforce Dismissed
0.4%
Year Ending 31 Mar
2023/24
Allegations Finalised
13,208
Officers Involved
6,950 (4.4%)
Referred to Proceedings
1,312
Dismissals
563
% Workforce Dismissed
0.4%

Most allegations do not end in dismissal: 31% of allegations finalised in the year to 31 March 2025 had a case to answer, and dismissals were 0.4% of the officer workforce.


<0.5%

Gross Misconduct & Dismissal Rate

Dismissals represent a tiny structural proportion of the national police headcount, heavily contextualized by these three operational realities:

1

Findings ≠ Dismissal

Of officers found to have committed misconduct (not gross) in the year to 31 March 2025, 87% received a written or final written warning (Home Office). RPRP is a non-disciplinary route for conduct below the misconduct threshold.

2

Gross ≈ Dismissal

Since 28 May 2025, proven gross misconduct means dismissal unless the panel finds exceptional circumstances justifying a final written warning or reduction in rank (regulation 42(3)(b)). Even before that, 88% of officers found to have committed gross misconduct in the year to 31 March 2025 were dismissed.

3

The Resignation Factor

Officers can resign or retire before a hearing, but gross misconduct proceedings can continue against a former officer (regulation 4). A "would have been dismissed" finding puts them on the barred list, and these findings are counted in the dismissal figures.


C) Investigation Duration

There is no overall statutory deadline. If an investigation is not finished within 12 months, the force must report the reasons to the local policing body, then every 6 months (regulation 19). Home Office figures for officer cases finalised in the year to 31 March 2025 (cumulative):

31%
Within 3 Months
46%
Within 6 Months
69%
Within 12 Months

(31% took more than 12 months and 9% more than 24 months. The median was 210 days overall, and 478 days for cases with at least one misconduct proceeding.)


D) Outcome Distribution

Of the 1,687 officers referred to proceedings in cases finalised in the year to 31 March 2025 (Home Office):

  • Gross misconduct found: 790 officers (47%).
  • Misconduct found: 579 officers (34%), 87% of whom received a written or final written warning.
  • No misconduct found: 267 officers (16%). The panel can then refer the matter to reflective practice or take no further action.
  • Proceedings discontinued: 51 officers (3%).
  • Reduction in Rank: Rare: 10 officers in the year (7 at hearings, 3 at accelerated hearings).
  • Dismissal: 695 officers, including "would have been dismissed" findings, all of whom must be reported for the barred list.

E) Methodology & Limitations

  • Data Source: Home Office statistical bulletin (financial year ending 31 March, England & Wales).
  • Multiple Allegations: The allegation count does not equal the individual officer count. One officer can face multiple allegations from a single incident.
  • Complexity Limits: Case complexity varies significantly. A single complex IOPC case spans multiple reporting years.
  • Force Practice: Force-level practices and recording mechanisms may vary, causing regional data skews.
  • Causation: Statistics show volume and outcomes but do not infer underlying causation regarding officer behaviour trends.

Deep Dive Guides

Detailed regulation analysis.

What Is Police Misconduct?

The whole conduct process from allegation to outcome.

Read Guide

Under Investigation: Your Rights

Notice of investigation, interviews and what to do first.

Read Guide

How Long Investigations Take

Time limits, real-world data and what delay means.

Read Guide

Misconduct Meeting vs Hearing

Who sits, what they decide and how each is run.

Read Guide

Sanctions Explained

Warnings, reduction in rank and dismissal, and their effects.

Read Guide

Final Written Warning

How long it lasts, extension and what it blocks.

Read Guide

Gross Misconduct Examples

What counts, by standard, and what tends to follow.

Read Guide

IOPC Investigations

When the IOPC investigates officers and what follows.

Read Guide

Arrested or Criminally Investigated

How criminal and misconduct cases run together, and suspension.

Read Guide

Social Media & Off-Duty Conduct

When posts, messages and side jobs become misconduct.

Read Guide

Federation & Legal Support

Who can represent you and what support exists.

Read Guide

Solicitors & Legal Cover

Who can represent you, who pays and what to check.

Read Guide

Driving Offences & Misconduct

Speeding, drink driving, bans and on-duty collisions.

Read Guide

Pension Exit Report

Your pension in pounds if you resign, retire or are dismissed.

Read Guide

Gross Incompetence & Performance

The two-stage performance and attendance procedures.

Read Guide

Regulation 13 Explained

Capability procedure for student officers.

Read Guide

Failing Police Vetting

Outcomes when vetting status is withdrawn.

Read Guide

Suspension & Restrictions

Impact on pay, allowances and powers.

Read Guide

Statistics & Outcomes

National analysis of dismissal rates.

Read Guide

Transfer With Live Misconduct

Rules on moving forces during investigation.

Read Guide

Pension After Dismissal

Forfeiture rules and protected rights.

Read Guide

Reflective Practice (RPRP)

The learning process for lower-level mistakes.

Read Guide

Promotion With Misconduct

Impact of warnings and live cases.

Read Guide

Accelerated Hearings

Fast-track procedures for gross misconduct.

Read Guide

Appeal Process

Deadlines, grounds and tribunal procedures.

Read Guide

PAT Decisions Data

Analysis of appeal success rates & outcomes.

Read Guide

The 10 Standards

Complete guide to the Standards of Professional Behaviour.

Read Guide

Common Questions

What is police misconduct?

Under the Police (Conduct) Regulations 2020, misconduct is a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour so serious as to justify disciplinary action, and gross misconduct is a breach so serious as to justify dismissal (regulation 2(1)). Lower-level issues that fall short of misconduct are 'practice requiring improvement', handled through the non-disciplinary reflective practice review process.

What is the difference between misconduct and gross misconduct?

Misconduct is a breach of the Standards of Professional Behaviour serious enough to justify disciplinary action; it usually leads to a written or final written warning, and only at a hearing with a live final written warning or several unconnected incidents can it lead to reduction in rank or dismissal. Gross misconduct is a breach so serious as to justify dismissal; since 28 May 2025 a gross misconduct finding means dismissal without notice unless exceptional circumstances justify a final written warning or reduction in rank (regulation 42).

What happens at a police misconduct hearing?

A panel considers evidence, hears representations and decides whether the allegations are proven on the balance of probabilities. If proven, outcomes range from written warnings or reduction in rank to dismissal without notice.

Can you resign before a misconduct hearing?

You can give notice, but it does not stop gross misconduct proceedings. The Conduct Regulations continue to apply to a former officer where the allegation came to light before they left or within 12 months afterwards, or later with an IOPC special determination (regulation 4). If gross misconduct is found, the outcome is a finding that you would have been dismissed, which puts you on the police barred list, and leaving while under investigation means a report for the police advisory list (Police Act 1996, sections 88A and 88I). Check any notice or consent rules that apply to you with your representative.

Does gross misconduct lead to losing my police pension?

Not automatically. Dismissal does not in itself take away pension you have built up. Forfeiture is a separate process that needs a criminal conviction: in the 2015 scheme, an offence connected with police service where the Home Secretary issues a forfeiture certificate, or specified official secrets or national security offences with long sentences (Police Pensions Regulations 2015, regulation 211). The older schemes have their own rules.

How long does a misconduct investigation take?

There is no overall time limit. If an investigation is not finished within 12 months, the force must report the reasons and plans to the local policing body, and again every 6 months (regulation 19). Home Office figures for cases finalised in the year to 31 March 2025 show a median of 210 days overall, and 478 days where there was at least one misconduct proceeding.

What is the College of Policing Barred List?

The police barred list is kept by the College of Policing under Part 4A of the Police Act 1996. Officers dismissed at conduct or performance proceedings, former officers found that they would have been dismissed, and police staff dismissed for conduct, efficiency or effectiveness reasons must be reported within 5 working days and listed. From 21 September 2026 no law enforcement employer, including police forces, the NCA, BTP, the IOPC and the College, may employ or appoint a barred person (Crime and Policing Act 2026, section 205). You can apply for removal after 5 years (3 for gross incompetence).

Can I be promoted with a misconduct finding?

It depends on force policy. The Conduct Regulations set no national bar, except that taking part in reflective practice cannot be used to stop a promotion (regulation 66(3)). Some forces make officers with a live warning ineligible until it expires. After a reduction in rank, Home Office guidance sets a 2 year rebuttable presumption against re-appointment to the rank you lost.

Do I get paid while suspended from duty?

Yes. Suspension under the Conduct Regulations must be with pay (regulation 11(3)). Home Office guidance says pay, including relevant allowances, is what you would receive if not suspended, including a temporary promotion allowance (paragraph 5.30). Schedule 2 to the Police Regulations 2003 limits which allowances continue and stops pay while you are in custody after conviction or absent with your whereabouts unknown. Overtime you would have worked is not paid because you are not working it.

What are restricted duties?

Restricted or adjusted duties are not a separate status in the regulations. They are how forces use the alternative to suspension: before suspending, the force must consider temporary redeployment to other duties or another location (regulation 11(5)). In practice it can mean removal from frontline roles or specific authorities, such as firearms or response driving, while an investigation runs; the detail is set by force policy.

Are police misconduct hearings public?

Yes. Misconduct hearings and accelerated misconduct hearings must be held in public (regulations 39(1) and 59(1)), but the person chairing can exclude people, impose conditions on attendance and prohibit publication of any matter, and must give written reasons to the local policing body if they do. Misconduct meetings are held in private.

Who chairs a police misconduct hearing?

From 2016 until May 2024 hearings were chaired by independent legally qualified chairs. Since 7 May 2024, for officers up to chief superintendent, a misconduct hearing is heard by a panel chaired by the chief officer (or a delegate who is a senior officer, a former senior officer or, unless the case substantially involves operational policing, a senior police staff member) with two lay members appointed by the police and crime commissioner. A legally qualified person advises the panel but does not decide (regulations 28(4) and (5B) and 2(4A) to (4C)). Accelerated hearings are conducted by the chief officer alone or a delegate (regulation 55).

Can I appeal a misconduct dismissal?

Yes. After a misconduct hearing or accelerated hearing you can appeal the finding (unless you admitted it) and the outcome to the Police Appeals Tribunal, giving written notice to the local policing body within 10 working days of first receiving the written decision (Police Appeals Tribunals Rules 2020, rules 4 and 9). The grounds are that the decision was unreasonable, new evidence, or a procedural breach or unfairness that could have materially affected it.

What is the standard of proof in misconduct cases?

Panels use the civil standard of proof: the balance of probabilities. A panel must not find misconduct or gross misconduct unless it is satisfied on the balance of probabilities, or the officer admits it (regulation 41(16)). It is not the criminal standard of 'beyond reasonable doubt'.

What is the Reflective Practice Review Process (RPRP)?

RPRP is a non-disciplinary process designed to handle minor mistakes and lower-level breaches. The focus is on finding root causes, continuous learning, and development, rather than issuing formal punitive warnings.

How long does a Final Written Warning stay on my record?

A final written warning remains in force for 2 years from the day it is notified to you, and a misconduct hearing can extend it to a maximum of 5 years (regulation 42(9) and (10)). If a new allegation is assessed while it is live, the case must go to a misconduct hearing, and reduction in rank or dismissal become available even for misconduct (regulations 23(10)(b) and 42(5)).

Can I transfer between police forces with a live investigation?

The Conduct Regulations do not prevent it; whether a receiving force will accept you during an investigation is a matter for its policy. Home Office guidance says a live warning transfers with you and remains live (paragraph 11.130).

What happens if a student officer faces misconduct?

Student officers are covered by the misconduct procedures like anyone else. During probation the chief officer can instead use regulation 13 of the Police Regulations 2003 to dispense with their services. Home Office guidance says gross misconduct should ordinarily go through disciplinary proceedings, and where misconduct is not admitted the misconduct procedures will apply in most if not all cases (paragraphs 4.87 to 4.89). A probationer discharged under regulation 13 is not placed on the barred list (paragraph 4.92).

How many police officers are dismissed each year?

Home Office figures show 695 officers were dismissed or found that they would have been dismissed in cases finalised in the year to 31 March 2025, up from 563 the year before, equal to 0.4% of the officer workforce in both years (Police misconduct, England and Wales, published 22 January 2026, Official Statistics in Development).

Am I entitled to legal representation?

At a misconduct hearing or accelerated misconduct hearing, yes: you have the right to be represented by a relevant lawyer of your choice (regulation 8(1)). At a misconduct meeting you can be represented only by a police friend (regulation 8(4)), though you can take legal advice beforehand. Federation members may be able to get legal assistance, subject to the Federation's own criteria.