Police Pay

Police Staff Redundancy Rights Explained

Unlike warranted officers, police staff are ordinary employees — which means genuine UK redundancy law applies to you in full. Here's what that actually means: fair selection, consultation, suitable alternative employment, and where to check what your own force offers.

Updated 21 September 2026 · Independent Guide · General Information, Not Legal Advice
Quick Answer

If you're police staff — a non-warranted civilian employee such as a call handler, forensic or CSI worker, HR, finance, IT, or a civilian investigator — you're covered by the same UK redundancy law that applies to most employees. That includes statutory redundancy pay with two or more years' service, fair selection criteria, a proper consultation process, and the right to be considered for suitable alternative employment before being dismissed. Many forces also run their own more generous contractual schemes on top of the statutory minimum — always check your own force's HR policy for the specifics that apply to you.

Why this genuinely doesn't apply to officers

This is one of the clearer structural differences between police staff and warranted officers, and it surprises a lot of people. A warranted officer holds the office of constable rather than a contract of employment, so the redundancy provisions in the Employment Rights Act 1996 don't attach to them at all — there is no legal mechanism to make a serving constable redundant. Police staff, by contrast, are employed under an ordinary contract of employment, so redundancy law applies to you in exactly the way it would at most other employers.

If you want the full explanation of why officer status is different, and the real routes that do end an officer's career (probationary dismissal, misconduct, ill-health retirement and so on), that's covered in depth in our companion guide.

Read: Can Police Officers Be Made Redundant? Officer-side guide → See the full list of differences between police staff and officers Compare →

What actually makes a redundancy situation "genuine"

Redundancy, in law, is about the role — not the person in it. A genuine redundancy situation exists where an employer no longer needs employees to carry out work of a particular kind, in a particular place, or in the same numbers as before — for example because a service is being reorganised, a function is being outsourced or automated, or budget pressures mean fewer posts of a given type are needed. It applies regardless of who currently holds the role.

That distinction matters, because it's what separates a lawful redundancy from an unfair dismissal dressed up as one. If what's actually happening is that an employer is unhappy with a specific individual's performance or conduct, and uses "redundancy" as the label for removing that person while the role itself continues to exist and be filled, that isn't a genuine redundancy — and it can be challenged.

Performance-based dismissal
About an individual's own sustained performance against role requirements — not about whether the role itself is still needed.
Misconduct dismissal
About specific conduct findings against an individual, following the force's disciplinary process.
Resignation
The employee's own choice to leave, for any reason, on notice.
Fixed-term contract simply ending
Reaching the end of an agreed fixed term is a different legal event from redundancy, though genuine redundancy principles can still be relevant in some circumstances.

What genuine redundancy law actually gives you

As a police staff employee facing a genuine redundancy situation, the same core protections apply to you as to most other UK employees:

Statutory redundancy pay

With two or more years' continuous service, you qualify for statutory redundancy pay calculated by age band, length of service and weekly pay, subject to the statutory weekly pay cap.

A genuine redundancy situation

The role or a number of posts must genuinely no longer be needed — not a relabelled performance or conduct dismissal.

Fair, objective selection criteria

Where a pool of employees is being reduced, selection must be based on fair, objective criteria applied consistently, not an arbitrary or discriminatory choice.

Individual consultation

You're entitled to meaningful individual consultation about the proposal, the selection process and any alternatives, before a final decision is made.

Collective consultation (20+ proposed at one establishment)

Where 20 or more redundancies are proposed at one establishment within 90 days, the force must collectively consult recognised unions or elected representatives under TULRCA, with a minimum consultation period before dismissals take effect.

Suitable alternative employment

The force must consider redeployment into a suitable alternative role before dismissing for redundancy.

The right to challenge an unfair process

If a genuine redundancy situation, fair selection or proper consultation isn't followed, you may have grounds for an unfair dismissal claim.

What tends to trigger a genuine redundancy situation

Redundancy situations for police staff don't arise in a vacuum — they're almost always tied to a wider organisational change. Common, genuine triggers include a force reorganising a department so that fewer posts of a certain kind are needed, a support function being centralised, shared with another force, or outsourced to an external provider, a service being scaled back or discontinued because of budget pressures, or new technology and systems reducing the number of staff needed to deliver the same function. None of these has to happen in isolation — a force merger, covered in a separate guide on this site, can involve several of these triggers at once.

What all of these genuinely have in common is that the change is about the work itself, not about any specific individual's suitability for it. That's the throughline that separates a genuine redundancy situation from a dismissal that's really about performance or conduct wearing a redundancy label.

The two-year qualifying rule

To qualify for statutory redundancy pay, you generally need at least two years' continuous service with your employer under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Statutory redundancy pay is then calculated using a formula based on your age band, your length of service, and your weekly pay — subject to the statutory weekly pay cap, which is reviewed and uprated periodically, so check the current figure at gov.uk rather than relying on a number you've seen elsewhere.

If you have less than two years' service, you generally won't qualify for statutory redundancy pay, though you may still be entitled to notice pay and other contractual entitlements, and a genuine redundancy process (fair selection, consultation, consideration of alternatives) is still good practice for an employer to follow even where statutory redundancy pay itself isn't in play. If this applies to you, it's worth checking your own contract and your force's HR policy directly.

Collective consultation: the 20+ threshold

Individual consultation — being told what's proposed and given a genuine chance to respond — applies whenever you personally are at risk of redundancy. But where a force proposes 20 or more redundancies at one establishment within a 90-day period, additional obligations kick in under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA): the employer must collectively consult recognised trade unions, or elected employee representatives where no union is recognised, before any dismissals take effect.

A minimum consultation period applies before dismissals can take effect once that threshold is reached, and the exact minimum period depends on the numbers involved — rather than assert a specific day-count here, the honest answer is to check the current statutory minimum directly (your union or staff association will know it, and it's a matter of public record) rather than rely on a figure that may be out of date or misremembered.

If a force is proposing a genuinely large-scale restructuring — for example as part of a merger or a major service redesign — this collective consultation duty is one of the clearest signs of how seriously the law treats large redundancy exercises, and it's a process your union or staff association will typically be directly involved in from an early stage.

It's worth being clear about what this threshold does and doesn't change. Below 20 proposed redundancies at one establishment within 90 days, individual consultation still applies in full — you don't lose your right to a genuine, meaningful conversation about the proposal just because the numbers are small. What changes above the threshold is the addition of a parallel, collective process with recognised unions or elected representatives, running alongside (not instead of) your own individual consultation.

Suitable alternative employment

Before dismissing anyone for redundancy, an employer — including a police force — is expected to consider whether there's a suitable alternative role the employee could move into instead, rather than jumping straight to dismissal. What counts as "suitable" depends on the individual's circumstances: their skills, experience, pay, location, and how the alternative role compares to their current one.

This cuts both ways. If you're offered a genuinely suitable alternative role and you turn it down without good reason, you risk losing your entitlement to redundancy pay — the law treats an unreasonable refusal of a suitable offer as effectively opting out of the redundancy situation. If the offered role genuinely isn't suitable (a significant pay cut, an unreasonable location change, or a role that doesn't use your skills, for example), that's a different picture, and your reasons for declining matter.

Because "suitable" and "unreasonable" are both judged on the specifics, if you're weighing up whether to accept or decline an alternative role during a redundancy process, it's worth getting advice from your union or staff association before deciding, rather than assuming either outcome is automatic.

If the process isn't followed properly

A redundancy dismissal has to actually follow a fair process to be lawful: a genuine redundancy situation, fair and objective selection criteria applied consistently, meaningful consultation, and proper consideration of suitable alternative employment. If a force skips or short-circuits any of these — for example by picking who to make redundant based on something other than fair, objective criteria, or by presenting a decision as already made rather than genuinely consulting — that opens the door to an unfair dismissal claim, separate from any dispute about the redundancy payment itself.

Most forces also have an internal appeal stage built into their redundancy process, allowing an affected employee to challenge the selection decision or process before it's finalised. If you're going through this, your union or staff association representative is the right first port of call — both to understand your specific force's process and to help you judge whether what's happening looks procedurally sound.

An unfair dismissal claim and a dispute over the redundancy payment itself are two separate things, and it's worth keeping that distinction clear in your own head even if both end up in play at once. A dispute about whether you were paid the correct statutory (or enhanced contractual) redundancy amount is essentially a calculation question. A claim that the dismissal itself was unfair is a broader question about whether the whole process — the genuineness of the redundancy, the fairness of selection, the adequacy of consultation — met the legal standard. Time limits apply to bringing a formal claim, so if you think you have grounds, getting advice promptly rather than waiting matters more than it might feel like it does in the moment.

What "good" consultation actually looks like, from your side

"Consultation" can sound like a formality, but done properly it's meant to be a genuine two-way process, not a box-ticking briefing. Good consultation means being given enough real information to understand the proposal — the business reason, the pool you're in, the criteria being used and how they apply to you — early enough that your response could realistically still change the outcome, not after the decision has effectively already been made.

It also means being told clearly what alternatives have been, or will be, considered on your behalf: redeployment searches, retraining, part-time or reduced-hours options, or a role elsewhere in the force. If you're not being told any of this, it's a fair and reasonable thing to ask for directly, in writing, rather than assume it's happening in the background.

Bringing a union or staff association representative to consultation meetings is standard practice, not an escalation — most people find it makes the conversation more structured and less stressful, and a rep who deals with these processes regularly will often spot things worth pushing back on that aren't obvious from the inside of a single, personally stressful process.

Statutory minimum vs your force's own scheme

Everything above describes the statutory minimum — the legal floor that applies to every qualifying employee in the UK, police staff included. It is not necessarily what you'd actually receive. Many police forces run their own contractual redundancy schemes that pay more generously than the statutory formula, as part of their wider staff terms and conditions.

What's actually on offer varies significantly by force, and isn't something this guide — or any general guide — can state accurately for your specific situation. If redundancy is a live possibility for you, the right next steps are: check your own force's HR policy or staff handbook directly, speak to your union or staff association (UNISON, Unite and GMB all represent police staff, alongside force-specific staff associations), and don't assume a figure you've seen quoted for a different force, or for officers, applies to you.

A genuine redundancy process, step by step

Exact procedures vary by force, but a properly run redundancy process generally moves through a broadly similar shape:

1

Business case / proposal

The force identifies a genuine business reason why a role, or a number of roles, may no longer be needed — a reorganisation, a service reduction, a budget-driven restructure, or a function being outsourced or automated. This is the point at which HR and, where the numbers involved meet the threshold, recognised unions are typically first briefed.

2

Pooling and provisional selection criteria

Where more than one person could potentially be affected, the force identifies the genuine pool of employees whose roles are at risk, and sets out the criteria it proposes to use to select within that pool if not everyone can be retained.

3

Notification / at-risk status

Affected employees are formally told they are at risk of redundancy, and given the reasons, the proposed timetable, and the proposed selection criteria (where relevant).

4

Individual consultation

Each affected employee is entitled to meaningful individual consultation — a genuine opportunity to respond to the proposal, ask questions, suggest alternatives, and understand how any selection criteria apply to them specifically, before a final decision is made.

5

Collective consultation (where the 20+ threshold applies)

Where 20 or more redundancies are proposed at one establishment within 90 days, the force must also collectively consult recognised trade unions or elected representatives, in parallel with individual consultation, before any dismissals take effect.

6

Consideration of alternatives

Before confirming any dismissal, the force is expected to have genuinely considered alternatives — redeployment into a suitable alternative role, voluntary redundancy, retraining, or reduced hours, depending on what's realistic in the circumstances.

7

Decision and notice

Where redundancy is confirmed, the employee is given formal notice, along with details of their redundancy pay calculation and any applicable notice pay.

8

Appeal

Most forces provide an internal appeal stage, allowing the employee to challenge the selection decision or the process itself before it's treated as final.

For managers: what a defensible process actually looks like

If you're a manager involved in running a redundancy process rather than affected by one, the practical risk to guard against is a process that looks, on paper, like a decision that was already made before consultation started. Genuine consultation means the outcome is genuinely still open when it begins — employees should be able to influence the pool, the criteria, or the outcome, not simply be informed of a finished decision.

Documenting the business reason for the redundancy situation, the pool selected and why, the criteria used and how they were scored, and the alternatives genuinely considered for each affected employee, is what allows a force to show — if the process is later challenged — that it was handled fairly and lawfully. Skipping that documentation doesn't just create legal risk; it also makes it much harder to have a fair, defensible conversation with an individual employee about why they were selected.

Common myths, corrected

"Redundancy and dismissal for poor performance are basically the same thing."
They're legally distinct. Redundancy is about whether a role or a number of posts is still needed, decided independently of who is in it. Performance dismissal is about an individual's own record against their role's requirements. Using one label to disguise the other is a recognised route to an unfair dismissal claim.
"If you've worked somewhere less than two years, you get nothing."
You generally won't qualify for statutory redundancy pay without two years' continuous service, but you may still be entitled to your notice period and other contractual entitlements, and a genuinely fair process is still good practice even where statutory redundancy pay itself doesn't apply.
"Every force pays the same redundancy terms."
No. The statutory scheme is a UK-wide legal minimum, but many forces run their own more generous contractual schemes on top of it, and what's actually on offer varies by force — always check your own force's current policy.
"You have no say in who gets selected."
Fair, objective selection criteria are a legal requirement, individual consultation is a legal right, and you can challenge a selection decision — through your force's internal appeal process, and ultimately through an unfair dismissal claim if the process genuinely wasn't fair.
"Turning down any alternative role protects your redundancy pay."
The opposite can be true. Unreasonably refusing a genuinely suitable alternative role can cost you your redundancy pay entitlement entirely, regardless of how the original redundancy situation arose.

Worked scenarios

Illustrative examples showing how the rules above apply in practice — not drawn from any specific real case.

A single back-office role is deleted

Context: A force restructures a finance team and decides one administrative post is no longer needed, while the rest of the team continues unchanged.

What applies: Because only one role is affected, this sits below the 20+ collective consultation threshold, but the individual affected is still entitled to a genuine, individual consultation process, fair consideration of the business reason, and consideration of any suitable alternative role elsewhere in the force before dismissal.

A department-wide restructure

Context: A force redesigns a whole department, reducing the total number of posts and changing job descriptions, affecting well over 20 staff at one site.

What applies: This triggers the collective consultation duty under TULRCA, alongside individual consultation with each affected employee. A minimum consultation period applies before any dismissals can take effect, and unions are typically involved from the pooling and criteria stage onward.

A voluntary scheme launched first

Context: Before any compulsory selection, the force invites expressions of interest in voluntary redundancy across the affected area, to see how many posts can be reduced without compulsory selection.

What applies: Employees who volunteer aren't automatically accepted — the force still decides based on business need, such as retaining specific skills. If enough suitable volunteers come forward, compulsory selection for the remainder may not be needed at all.

An employee declines an alternative role

Context: An employee at risk of redundancy is offered a role in a different team, doing broadly similar work at the same grade and pay, but declines it because they'd prefer to take redundancy pay instead.

What applies: Whether this is treated as an unreasonable refusal — risking loss of redundancy pay — depends on whether the alternative was genuinely suitable for that individual's circumstances. This is exactly the kind of judgement call worth discussing with a union rep before making a final decision.

If you've been told you're at risk: a practical checklist

Ask HR in writing what the genuine business reason for the redundancy situation is, and which pool you're being considered in
Ask for the selection criteria in writing, and how they'll be scored or applied
Check your own continuous service date, so you know whether the two-year qualifying rule applies to you
Contact your union or staff association early — before, not after, any consultation meeting
Ask specifically whether your force runs an enhanced contractual redundancy scheme, and what it actually pays compared with the statutory minimum
Keep your own written notes of consultation meetings, including dates and what was discussed
If offered an alternative role, get the details in writing before deciding whether it's genuinely suitable for you
Ask about the internal appeal process before you need it, so you know the timeline if you do need to challenge a decision

Quick glossary

Employment Rights Act 1996
The core UK statute setting out the statutory redundancy pay scheme, qualifying service rules, and unfair dismissal protections that apply to police staff as employees.
TULRCA
The Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 — the statute that sets out the collective consultation duty owed to recognised unions or elected representatives where 20 or more redundancies are proposed at one establishment within 90 days.
Statutory redundancy pay
The legal minimum redundancy payment, calculated by age band, length of service and weekly pay, subject to the statutory weekly pay cap.
Statutory weekly pay cap
A ceiling on the weekly pay figure used in the statutory redundancy pay formula, reviewed and uprated periodically — check the current figure at gov.uk rather than relying on a remembered number.
Suitable alternative employment
A genuinely comparable alternative role an employer must consider offering before dismissing for redundancy; unreasonably refusing one can forfeit redundancy pay.
Pool for selection
The defined group of employees whose roles are genuinely comparable and at risk, within which selection criteria are applied if not everyone can be retained.
Unfair dismissal
A legal claim available where a dismissal — including one labelled as redundancy — wasn't handled fairly, whether because the redundancy wasn't genuine, the selection process wasn't fair, or consultation wasn't properly carried out.

FAQ

Can police staff actually be made redundant?
Yes. Unlike warranted officers, who hold the office of constable rather than a contract of employment, police staff are ordinary employees. That means the full statutory redundancy regime in the Employment Rights Act 1996 applies to them, in the same way it applies to most other UK employees.
How long do you need to work for a force before you qualify for statutory redundancy pay?
You generally need at least two years' continuous service to qualify for statutory redundancy pay under the Employment Rights Act 1996. Statutory redundancy pay itself is calculated by age band, length of service and weekly pay, subject to the statutory weekly pay cap, which is reviewed and uprated periodically — check the current figure at gov.uk.
What makes a redundancy situation genuine, rather than a disguised performance dismissal?
A genuine redundancy is about a role, or a certain number of posts, no longer being needed — because of a reorganisation, a service being reduced, outsourced or automated, for example — regardless of who happens to be in the role. It is not about an individual's performance or conduct. If an employer uses "redundancy" as a label for what is really a performance-based dismissal, that can be challenged as unfair dismissal.
When does collective consultation apply to a police force making staff redundant?
Where a force proposes 20 or more redundancies at one establishment within a 90-day period, it must collectively consult recognised trade unions or elected employee representatives under the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 (TULRCA), and a minimum consultation period applies before any dismissals can take effect. The exact minimum period depends on the numbers involved — check the current statutory minimum rather than assuming a figure.
What is "suitable alternative employment" and why does it matter?
Before dismissing someone for redundancy, an employer — including a police force — must consider whether there is a suitable alternative role the employee could be redeployed into. If a genuinely suitable alternative is offered and the employee unreasonably refuses it, they risk losing their entitlement to redundancy pay. Whether a role counts as "suitable" and whether a refusal is "reasonable" both depend on the individual's specific circumstances.
Do all forces pay the same redundancy terms?
No. The statutory scheme is a minimum floor that applies everywhere, but many forces run their own contractual redundancy schemes that are more generous than the statutory minimum. What's actually on offer varies by force, so check your own force's HR policy, staff handbook, or your union or staff association, rather than assuming any particular figure applies to you.

More questions, answered briefly

Does part-time or flexible working status affect redundancy rights?
No — part-time and flexible working employees have the same underlying redundancy rights as full-time employees, and selection criteria that disadvantage part-time or flexible workers without good reason can itself be challenged as unfair or discriminatory.
Can you be selected for redundancy while on maternity, adoption or shared parental leave?
Employees on these types of leave have specific additional protections during a redundancy process, including priority for suitable alternative vacancies in some circumstances — if this applies to you, raise it directly and early with HR and your union.
What's the difference between notice pay and redundancy pay?
Notice pay covers your normal pay for your contractual or statutory notice period. Redundancy pay is a separate, additional payment for losing your job to redundancy. They aren't the same thing and don't substitute for each other.
Can a redundancy be withdrawn once notice has been given?
In principle, an employer can withdraw a redundancy notice before it takes effect, generally with the employee's agreement, though the specifics depend on what's been formally communicated and agreed — check directly with HR and your union if this situation arises.
Does redundancy pay count as taxable income?
Redundancy pay generally has different tax treatment to ordinary salary, including some tax-free allowance, but the exact rules and current thresholds are a matter for HMRC guidance and your own payroll/HR team, not something to assume from memory.
Who counts as an "establishment" for the 20+ collective consultation threshold?
It generally refers to the specific workplace or unit the affected employees are assigned to, rather than the whole force — but this can be a technical question in a large, multi-site organisation like a police force, so it's one worth clarifying with your union if collective consultation numbers are being discussed.

Officers vs police staff: redundancy specifics at a glance

Warranted Officers Police Staff
Can be made redundant? No — office of constable, not a contract of employment Yes — ordinary employee under the Employment Rights Act 1996
Qualifying service for statutory redundancy pay Not applicable Two or more years' continuous service
Collective consultation duty (20+ at one site within 90 days) Not applicable Applies under TULRCA
Suitable alternative employment doctrine Not applicable Applies — unreasonable refusal risks losing redundancy pay
On a force merger Statutory transfer of office, typically under the Police Act 1996 TUPE 2006 can apply
Enhanced scheme beyond the legal minimum Not applicable Varies by force — check your own force's HR policy

Red flags worth raising with your rep

None of these automatically means a process is unlawful, but each is a reasonable prompt to ask more questions:

Consultation feels like a formality

If meetings are presented as informing you of a decision already made, rather than genuinely inviting your input on the proposal, pool or criteria, that undermines the legal requirement for meaningful consultation.

Selection criteria are vague or unexplained

Fair, objective criteria should be specific enough to be scored consistently. "General suitability" or similarly vague criteria, applied without a clear scoring rationale, are harder to defend as objective.

You're never told why you're in the pool you're in

The pool of employees considered for selection should be identifiable and explainable — if it isn't, that's worth raising directly.

An alternative role offer arrives with no real detail

A genuinely considered suitable alternative employment offer should come with enough detail (pay, hours, location, duties) for you to properly assess whether it's suitable for your circumstances.

No internal appeal route is offered

Most properly run processes include an internal appeal stage. Its absence isn't necessarily unlawful on its own, but it removes an important safety check on the decision.

Good questions to bring to your union or staff association rep

? What's the genuine business reason for this redundancy situation, and can I see it in writing?
? What pool of roles am I being considered against, and why was it drawn that way?
? What are the selection criteria, and how will they actually be scored?
? Does our force's contractual redundancy scheme pay more than the statutory minimum, and what does it actually offer?
? Has the collective consultation threshold been reached, and if so, what's the minimum consultation period that applies?
? What counts as a "suitable" alternative role in this specific process, and who decides that?
? What's the internal appeal process and timeline if I want to challenge the outcome?

Related Guides

Independent Guide

PolicePay is independent and not affiliated with any police force, the Home Office or the College of Policing. This is general guidance on the legal framework, not legal advice — if your own role is genuinely at risk of redundancy, get advice from your union, staff association or a solicitor about your specific circumstances.