Sergeant Exam Questions & Answers
12 free sample questions, fully explained, at the same supervisory standard as the real NPPF step two legal exam: cut score 55%, most recent published pass rate 58.5%.
For an assault to amount to actual bodily harm (ABH) rather than common assault, what must the prosecution additionally prove?
ABH under s.47 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 requires an injury that interferes with health or comfort — bruising, minor cuts, or even a recognised psychiatric injury can qualify. It does not require intent to cause serious harm (that's closer to the threshold for GBH with intent), a weapon, or hospital treatment.
A defendant claims they used force in self-defence. What is the correct two-stage test the court applies?
Self-defence is judged on the defendant's honestly held belief in the need for force (even if that belief was mistaken), then whether the degree of force was reasonable given the circumstances as they believed them to be — not with the benefit of hindsight. There is no strict duty to retreat, and who struck first isn't determinative on its own.
Under the Theft Act 1968, which of these is NOT one of the five elements the prosecution must prove for theft?
Theft requires: appropriation, of property, belonging to another, dishonestly, with intention to permanently deprive. There is no minimum value threshold — theft of a low-value item is still theft in law, even where it affects charging decisions in practice.
What distinguishes criminal damage from aggravated criminal damage under the Criminal Damage Act 1971?
Aggravated criminal damage (s.1(2)) requires the additional element that the defendant intended, or was reckless as to, the damage endangering the life of another — it carries a maximum of life imprisonment. Arson (damage by fire, s.1(3)) is a separate way of charging the offence based on the method used, not the same distinction.
Under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984, what is the standard maximum period a suspect can be detained before charge without authorisation from a superintendent or above?
Section 41 PACE limits detention without charge to 24 hours from the 'relevant time'. For an indictable offence only, a superintendent or above may authorise detention up to 36 hours from the relevant time (s.42), and magistrates may issue warrants of further detention up to an absolute maximum of 96 hours (ss.43-44). For a summary-only offence the 24-hour limit cannot be extended. Arrests under s.41 Terrorism Act 2000 follow a separate regime. Code C (section 15) governs the reviews and records that accompany these limits.
A suspect is interviewed under caution but not told a solicitor is available before questioning begins. What is the most likely consequence for any admission made?
The right to legal advice under s.58 PACE and Code C is a significant and substantial safeguard. Breaching it doesn't make evidence automatically inadmissible, but gives the court a clear basis to exclude it under s.78 PACE where admitting it would adversely affect the fairness of the proceedings.
What is the correct current caution to be given to a suspect before or during an interview under caution?
The current England and Wales caution reflects that an inference can be drawn under the Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 from a failure to mention something later relied on in court — this is different from the simple 'right to silence' phrasing sometimes assumed from US media, and from the older 'unless you wish to do so … put into writing' caution used before s.34 came into force in 1995.
Under PACE Code D, what is the primary purpose of holding a formal identification procedure (e.g. VIPER) rather than simply asking a witness to point out a suspect informally?
Formal identification procedures under Code D exist to protect the reliability and fairness of eyewitness identification for everyone involved — badly conducted or suggestive identification is one of the most common causes of wrongful conviction, which is why the Code sets out strict, structured procedures.
Under s.1 PACE, what must an officer have before conducting a stop and search for stolen or prohibited articles?
Section 1 PACE searches require reasonable grounds to suspect the specific individual is carrying stolen or prohibited items — a genuinely held suspicion isn't enough on its own; it must be objectively reasonable and cannot be based on personal factors like appearance alone.
How does a search authorised under s.60 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 differ from a standard s.1 PACE search?
Section 60 is a suspicion-independent power — once a senior officer has authorised it for a specific locality and time period (typically because of anticipated serious violence), officers can search individuals within that area without needing reasonable suspicion about that particular person, unlike s.1 PACE.
What legal test governs whether an officer's use of force was lawful?
The test (s.3(1) Criminal Law Act 1967 and s.76 Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008, which reflects common law self-defence) is whether the force was reasonable in the circumstances as the officer honestly believed them to be (s.76(3) and (4)), and force that was disproportionate in those circumstances is not reasonable (s.76(6)). It is judged on the belief held at the time, not with hindsight, and it is not a requirement for the absolute minimum force theoretically available.
Which of these is a 'protected characteristic' under the Equality Act 2010 that a supervisor must have particular regard to when managing a team?
The nine protected characteristics under the Equality Act 2010 are age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage/civil partnership, pregnancy/maternity, race, religion or belief, sex, and sexual orientation. Political party membership, trade union membership and length of service are not protected characteristics under this Act.
335 More Questions, Plus Full Timed Papers
These 12 are a free sample. The paid toolkit has 347 checked questions for the sergeant paper, a full 150-question timed sitting scored against the real 55% cut score, CVF promotion board practice and, on the AI Pro tier, an AI tutor and board assessor.
Try The Full Mock Exam →Frequently Asked Questions
Are these real NPPF Sergeant exam questions?
No. The College of Policing has never published its real question bank or answer key, so no site can honestly offer the actual questions in advance. These are original PolicePay questions written to the same supervisory standard and covering the same three named subject areas (Crime, Evidence and procedure, General police duties), so you can practise the underlying legal reasoning rather than memorise leaked material that doesn't exist.
What subject areas does the Sergeant exam actually cover?
Crime, Evidence and procedure, and General police duties: 150 multiple-choice questions in 3 hours, drawn from the current edition of the Blackstone's Police Manuals. The pass mark (cut score) at the most recent published sitting was 55%.
How many of these questions are free?
All 12 sample questions on this page are free to read with full explanations. They come from the same free pool of 30 questions as our free mini mock. The paid toolkit has 347 checked questions for the sergeant paper, a timed 150-question sitting and progress tracking, plus an AI tutor and board assessor on the AI Pro tier.
Results day: what to do next
Leave your email and we will email you ourselves around results day with what to do next, whether you passed or not: the resit plan and dates if you need them, the next steps if you passed. Also exam dates and rule changes as they happen. No automatic emails.
Related
Independent guidance and original practice material, not affiliated with, endorsed by, or produced by the College of Policing.